<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 5D Mark II Autofocus Sucks?  NOT!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/</link>
	<description>News and Views from the world of Wildlife Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:52:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Avery</title>
		<link>http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/?p=2523#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>I just bought my new 5d mk11 as a second camera for weddings. Being used to the original 5d its took a little getting used to. My first impression. Too sharp and colour is off, too saturated. This camera needs to be tweeked. I tried the Neutral profile and was more happy with colour and sharpness. I doubt anyone that can judge natural colour could be happy with the cameras standard setting unless they like artificially saturated colour.  Once tweeked  The eyes are so sharp in photos even at 100% image size they show a new class of photo that the 5d mk1 simply cannot keep up with.  I shoot Large fine Jpeg to save time. I have no need for Raw as I shoot manually and have no problems with white balance, exposure. This saves time when editing images and helps your workflow.  I produce A2 size prints that are beautiful in Jpeg. This camera blows me away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought my new 5d mk11 as a second camera for weddings. Being used to the original 5d its took a little getting used to. My first impression. Too sharp and colour is off, too saturated. This camera needs to be tweeked. I tried the Neutral profile and was more happy with colour and sharpness. I doubt anyone that can judge natural colour could be happy with the cameras standard setting unless they like artificially saturated colour.  Once tweeked  The eyes are so sharp in photos even at 100% image size they show a new class of photo that the 5d mk1 simply cannot keep up with.  I shoot Large fine Jpeg to save time. I have no need for Raw as I shoot manually and have no problems with white balance, exposure. This saves time when editing images and helps your workflow.  I produce A2 size prints that are beautiful in Jpeg. This camera blows me away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Tower</title>
		<link>http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Tower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/?p=2523#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>I think with any relatively stationary subject the 5D Mk II&#039;s AF will work respectably. It&#039;s another story though with say moving children, even in well lit conditions. With my 1D Mk III, we are talking say 99%.  With the 5DM2 I get at most 50% with the moving people conditions.

No arguments with image quality and high iso though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think with any relatively stationary subject the 5D Mk II&#8217;s AF will work respectably. It&#8217;s another story though with say moving children, even in well lit conditions. With my 1D Mk III, we are talking say 99%.  With the 5DM2 I get at most 50% with the moving people conditions.</p>
<p>No arguments with image quality and high iso though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Das Foto News Special: Die browserFruits &#124; Digitale Fotografie Lernen - KWERFELDEIN - Martin Gommel</title>
		<link>http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Das Foto News Special: Die browserFruits &#124; Digitale Fotografie Lernen - KWERFELDEIN - Martin Gommel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/?p=2523#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>[...] # Canon 5D Mark II Autofocus Sucks? NOT. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] # Canon 5D Mark II Autofocus Sucks? NOT. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Moncus</title>
		<link>http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Moncus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/?p=2523#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>The only times I&#039;ve had AF problems with my 5D MkII is in low-light conditions. It&#039;s not really that bad, but my 40D&#039;s had better AF in the same low-light conditions. Other than that, even in similar situations to what you described, I&#039;ve had nothing but praise for the 5D MkII and it&#039;s AF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only times I&#8217;ve had AF problems with my 5D MkII is in low-light conditions. It&#8217;s not really that bad, but my 40D&#8217;s had better AF in the same low-light conditions. Other than that, even in similar situations to what you described, I&#8217;ve had nothing but praise for the 5D MkII and it&#8217;s AF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [REVIEW:] Canon 5D Mark II Autofocus Sucks? NOT!!! &#8211; Paul Burwell (WildShots) @ Photo News Today</title>
		<link>http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>[REVIEW:] Canon 5D Mark II Autofocus Sucks? NOT!!! &#8211; Paul Burwell (WildShots) @ Photo News Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/?p=2523#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>[...] and Read More: paulburwell.com Technorati Tags: Paul Burwell,Canon,1DS Mark II,5D Mark [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Read More: paulburwell.com Technorati Tags: Paul Burwell,Canon,1DS Mark II,5D Mark [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich C</title>
		<link>http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/?p=2523#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been enjoying my 5D Mark II for quite some time now Paul.  And I haven&#039;t had many complaints.  My only &quot;big&quot; auto focus issues have occurred while shooting fire dancers.  Pitch black surroundings and people speeding by with flames.  Beyond that, auto focus has been pretty good.  And the image quality?  I&#039;ve been thrilled.  When I do a 32x48&quot; gallery wrap it is sharp, sharp, sharp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been enjoying my 5D Mark II for quite some time now Paul.  And I haven&#8217;t had many complaints.  My only &#8220;big&#8221; auto focus issues have occurred while shooting fire dancers.  Pitch black surroundings and people speeding by with flames.  Beyond that, auto focus has been pretty good.  And the image quality?  I&#8217;ve been thrilled.  When I do a 32&#215;48&#8243; gallery wrap it is sharp, sharp, sharp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/?p=2523#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by paul_burwell: Just posted: Canon 5D Mark II Auto Focus Sucks? NOT!!! http://tinyurl.com/yfwuen5 #photography #5dmarkii #photog #togs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by paul_burwell: Just posted: Canon 5D Mark II Auto Focus Sucks? NOT!!! <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfwuen5" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yfwuen5</a> #photography #5dmarkii #photog #togs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon 5D Mark II Autofocus Sucks? NOT!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon 5D Mark II Autofocus Sucks? NOT!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/?p=2523#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>[...]             1 votes   vote     Canon 5D Mark II Autofocus Sucks? NOT!!!    I&#039;ve recently had the opportunity to start going through some of my pictures that I made [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]             1 votes   vote     Canon 5D Mark II Autofocus Sucks? NOT!!!    I&#39;ve recently had the opportunity to start going through some of my pictures that I made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Peak</title>
		<link>http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Peak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/?p=2523#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>I agreee with you . I have been shooting the 5D Mark II for about a year now and I have had NO problems.... Matter of fact I am working on a book right now that I used a 1D on and there is no comparison after today and I am seeing what I am able to do with the images from the 5D I could be a poster child for Canon!  and love the grizzly shot, your the best bud. Keep em comin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agreee with you . I have been shooting the 5D Mark II for about a year now and I have had NO problems&#8230;. Matter of fact I am working on a book right now that I used a 1D on and there is no comparison after today and I am seeing what I am able to do with the images from the 5D I could be a poster child for Canon!  and love the grizzly shot, your the best bud. Keep em comin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry</title>
		<link>http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/2009/10/canon-5d-mark-ii-autofocus-sucks-not/comment-page-1/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulburwell.com/blog/?p=2523#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>Superb image and one you should be doubly proud of considering the conditions in which it was taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superb image and one you should be doubly proud of considering the conditions in which it was taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
